• 1860 - 1864
  • 1860 Improving the City Cemetery
  • Chicago Tribune Items
  • The Board of Public Works
  • 1862 Cemetery Ordinance
  • January 1863 Interments
  • The Cemetery Park
  • Rosehill Cemetery and the Potter's Field
  • 1864 Special Meeting

Rosehill Cemetery was established in 1859, followed the next summer by Graceland Cemetery and the Catholic Calvary Cemetery.

These were Chicago's first rural cemeteries, following the model best illustrated by Mount Auburn Cemetery near Boston. Although Oak Woods Cemetery, located several miles south of the Chicago's city limits, was established in 1853, it did not begin interments until the mid 1860s.

The town of Lake View, located several miles north of the city limits, was high above the water table, alleviating Dr. John H. Rauch's concerns regarding the City Cemetery's location near the lakeshore. Lake View became the home of Graceland and Rosehill cemeteries. Calvary Cemetery established grounds on the lake shore of Chicago's current northern border, adjacent to the city of Evanston.

With the establishment of the new cemeteries miles beyond the city limits, Chicagoans had the first opportunity to move their loved ones from the City Cemetery grounds to more pleasant surroundings. Existing lot owners were given the option to exchange their City Cemetery lots for equal-sized lots at the other cemeteries.

The most prominent early disinterment (1861) was of Frances M. Pearce, the wife of H.O. Stone, who also commissioned a white marble sculpture in her likeness. Reclining with their baby, also named Frances, the sculpture depicts the mother and child, who died within months of each other during the cholera outbreak of 1854. This sepulchral monument from the City Cemetery stands today in Rosehill Cemetery.

During the Civil War years of 1862 through 1865, Camp Douglas, originally a Union camp, served as a prisoner of war camp for Confederate prisoners of war. During these years, due to the poor conditions at the Camp, the mortality rate for the rebel soldiers was extremely high. Nearly 4,000 of these soldiers were buried in the City Cemetery's potter's field. See the Potter's Field section for more details.

According to Dr. John H. Rauch, from January 1860 to March 1866, eleven thousand three hundred forty-one (11,341) individuals were buried in the City Cemetery. This figure includes the 4,000 Civil War rebels, mentioned above.


All documents on this page, courtesy of the Illinois Regional Archives Depository.

In this document, the "memorialists", as they were then referred to, are following up on a request by the Common Council to propose improvements to the City Cemetery. This group of cemetery lot owners pleaded for the city to improve the condition of the cemetery grounds in a letter dated November 9, 1859, which is presented in the previous section - 1855-1859.

The Common Council's reply to this document is also included here. Scroll to the right ---->>

_______________________

Chicago, January 7, 1860
Messr. Long, Taft & Carpenter
Special Committee on the Chicago Cemetery

Gentlemen

In compliance with your request the undersigned would respectfully place before you their views respecting the improvement of the Cemetery, in a detailed and somewhat specific form.

         In the first place the lands included in the Cemetery comprise about one hundred and twenty acres, situate mostly on the lake shore. Of these about Sixty acres have been surveyed into lots by the City and mostly sold. Perhaps not exceeding one half of this portion of the land has been occupied by actual interments.

         There is therefore about sixty (60) acres lying in a body wholly unsold and unoccupied. It lies North and directly adjoining the surveyed and sold portion of the Cemetery, and is exceedingly valuable for public purposes. It was purchased by the City out of moneys arising from the sale of lots and the cost price charged to the Cemetery Fund. We propose the

 

 

abandonment of the tract to the City to be used for Public Grounds and such other public purposed (if any) as the Common Council may devote it to. We would not advise its sale; such a step we think would be unwise.

         While this consenting and advising the abandonment for burial purposes part of the Cemetery land, we at the same time expect that at least a fair portion of its estimated value shall be devoted to the improvement of the residue. The whole value has been pledged for that purpose, and if withdrawn from sale the proposed arrangement would be equitable and proper. But a comparatively small part of such value would be required in addition to the unexpended balance of moneys arising from the sales of lots, standing to the credit of the Cemetery fund.

         We would, in the next place, remind your Committee, that in the South west corner of the Cemetery and outside of the enclosure, there is a small triangular piece containing about three acres, originally constituting a part of the Cemetery

 

 

grounds, but now separated therefrom by North Clark street. This small tract we would advise the sale of; the proceeds of the sale to be added to the Cemetery Fund for the like purpose of improvement.

         Lastly, in respect to the improvements proposed, we would suggest the following as an outline:

1st     That a permanent wall or iron railing be erected around that part of the land proposed to be devoted to burial purposes:
2nd     That suitable entrance gates and buildings be erected:
3rd     That such part of the land, within said limits, as has not been sold, be laid off by the city in such way as may contribute to the general improvement of the Cemetery, and planted with trees and evergreens; And
4th     That the avenues and walks through the Cemetery be permanently improved by gravelling or otherwise.

 

 

 

         These suggestions embrace in general terms the proposed improvements. It is obvious that they cannot be undertaken until a plan shall be prepared by some person or persons qualified for the work, in order that the most may be made of the natural features of the ground. And we close by expressing the wish that such a person may be immediately employed and the plans spoken of immediately prepared. Where this shall be done many of our Citizens stand ready to improve their lots in such a way as will materially aid in making the Cemetery a credit to the City.

Very respectfully Your Obt Svts,

George Manierre
Grant Goodrich
Mark Skinner
B.W. Raymond
William Jones
W.L. Newberry

 

 

February 13, 1860

To the Mayor and Aldermen of the City of Chicago, in Common Council assembled:

Your Special Committee to whom was referred the Memorial of Hon. Geo. Manierre, Wm Jones & others on the subject of permanently improving the Chicago Cemetery.

Having had the same under advisement, beg leave to report, That they have met & consulted with the Memorialists on the subject, who have kindly written out their views & furnished them to us, & which we adopt & herewith submit as part of our Report.

         A negotiation is now pending with the officers of the “Rose Hill Cemetery” for a Section of their grounds wherein to bury the dead falling under the City’s charge, & also to insure a cheap & proper burial place for the poor. It seems to have become a settled thing in the public mind, that no further extension of Cemetery grounds within the City limits be permitted, indeed when we look to the deterioration of property in their vicinity & the barrier which is placed to the improvement & extension of our City in their direction, we see the justice of the public sentiment.
         And your committee recommend that an agreement be entered into as speedily as possible, substantially in accordance with the draft of a contract submitted by the Mayor to this Council Nov. 10. 1859.         But our early settlers, the founders of our City are laid in the old burying ground – Fathers, mothers, children & friends there await the resurrection of the dead, & it becomes our sacred duty to protect the spot from dilapidation,

 

 

& ruin, & to so protect it that the utmost confidence may be obtained in its permanency. It has been sadly neglected, & in the language of the memorial, “there is perhaps no other City in this country in which the burial place of the dead has received so little attention.”

         The whole amount of lands purchased by the City for Cemetery purposes comprises about 120 acres, & the Ordinance dedicating them & the contract entered into with the purchasers of lots therein, provides that they “shall be kept & preserved as a place for the burial of the dead of said City, & that all moneys which have been or which may be received for lots sold therein shall be laid out & expended in paying for said grounds & in ornamenting & improving the same.”

         These grounds cost the City in the aggregate $5755. & we have realised from the sale of lots about $25,000. The exhibit in account with the Cemetery on the Comptroller’s Books, shows a surplus received over the cost of the land & all other expenses accrued of about $5000. & leaves one half the land, about 60 acres, unoccupied & at the future disposal of the City authorities. It is therefore proposed that some well devised plan should be prepared & entered into by the City in compliance with the recommendations accompanying this report, & in compliance with the prayer of the original memorial. With this view, we offer for passage the following orders:

        

 

 

Ordered – That the Mayor & Comptroller be requested to negotiate for the purchase of a piece of land lying on the South East corner of the Cemetery; it being necessary to bring the grounds at said S.E. corner to a right angle.
         Ordered – That all the grounds surveyed & laid out into lots in the “City Cemetery” & named respectively “old survey”, “new survey”, “last new survey” & “Green’s survey”, together with the piece of land named in the above order, if purchased, hereafter be the limits of the “Chicago Cemetery.”

         Ordered – That the Mayor & Comptroller be directed to cause a survey to be made & a system devised for the improvement of the Cemetery, to be prepared by competent persons, to be submitted to the Common Council for its adoption, and to be worked up to as means may allow - & the Mayor & Comptroller are hereby authorised to employ such assistance as may be deemed necessary for the purpose.

         Ordered – That Hon. Geo. Manierre, Hon. Mark Skinner, Walter Newberry, Esq., Wm. Jones, Esq., and J.N. Judd Esq. Be appointed a Committee to act in conjunction with the Mayor & Comptroller & any committee of the Common Council in carrying out the recommendations & orders herewith submitted, & that they be respectfully requested to accept the appointment & give the matter their particular attention & supervision, & apply to & advise with the Common Council at any time seemed necessary to further & consummate the object.

All of which is respectfully submitted,
James Long
Benjamin Carpenter       Sp. Com.


Chicago Tribune, February 21, 1860
These short newspaper articles tell of some ways the City was attempting to improve the city's cemetery grounds.

Chicago Press and Tribune, March 14, 1860



Chicago Tribune, May 13, 1861



Chicago Tribune, June 11, 1861



Although no new lots were sold after 1859, by 1862, the City Cemetery had been improved to include a small fountain. John C. Ure, a gardener who oversaw the public parks, was also responsible for the landscaping of the city's cemetery.

Chicago Tribune, April 2, 1862

This is an excerpt from a longer article titled, "Our Burial Places. Graceland, Rosehill and the City Cemeteries". The author gives an overview of some of the complaints related to the desire to move the City Cemetery. In addition to the perception of an urban proximity being objectionable as a final resting place, the article cites the health concerns as related to the argument that will come with greater force in 1866 with the publication of Dr. John H. Rauch's pamphlet titled, "Intramural Interments in Populous Cities, And Their Influence Upon Health and Epidemics."

Chicago Tribune, December 11, 1862


In 1861, the new Board of Public Works became responsible for the care and record-keeping relating to the Chicago City Cemetery.

See the complete list of cemetery related costs HERE.
_______________________________________________

REPORT TO THE COMMON COUNCIL

Office of the Board of Public Works,
Chicago, June 17th 1861

To the Mayor and Aldermen of the City of Chicago, in Common Council assembled:

By the amended Charter, as passed at the late session of the State Legislature, the charge of all “Public Grounds” was given to this Board. In order to carry out, what appears to them necessary in relation to the ‘Cemetery Grounds’, and to keep the same in proper order, and the walks in a suitable condition, so as to satisfy the demands of all of our citizens, interested therein – We would recommend, and ask the passage of the following Ordinance,
An ordinance concerning the Cemetery,


Courtesy of the Illinois Regional Archives Depository.

Be it Ordained, by the Common Council of the City of Chicago: That the Board of Public Works are hereby authorised and empowered, to take such steps as they may deem proper for the improvement of the “Cemetery Grounds”, and to improve the walks, and drains, or ditches, connected therewith, in such manner as they may deem most conducive to public conveniences, and the proper preservation of the same, And for the payment of all such expenses, they shall certify their approval of the same to the City Comptroller, who shall pay the same by appt on the City Treasurer payable out of the “Cemetery Fund.”
B. Carpenter
Bd. Pub Works

First Annual Report of the Board of Public Works of the Common Council of the City of Chicago, 1862

Board of Public Works

Commissioners
Benjamin Carpenter, President
Frederick Letz, Treasurer
John G. Gindele

Officers
E.S. Chesbrough, Chief Engineer
A.W. Tinkham, Secretary

**************

Commissioners’ Report.

Office of the Board of Public Works, February 24, 1862

To the Mayor and Aldermen of the City of Chicago in Common Council assembled:

Gentlemen: In conformity with the requirements of the new charter organizing the department of the municipal government, we transmit herewith the annual report of the Board of Public Works.
         The Board was organized May 6th, 1861. Suitable rooms had previously been provided in the Court House and as soon as was practicable the rented offices occupied by the late Boards of Water and Sewerage Commissioners were vacated. All the city departments are gathered into one building and it is a matter of considerable convenience to the citizens that the payment of the water tax and business with the water and sewerage departments as with other departments under the care of the Board and can be attended to where the general city tax is paid, and where are the various offices of the city government.
         By the terms of the act of organization this Board is charged with the care of the Water Works and the Sewerage Works, the Public Parks and other public places of the city, the Streets the River and Harbor and Public Buildings, the Bridges, the Lamps and Lights to the lighting of public places and buildings of the city and with the direction of all the public improvements hereafter to be commenced by the city.
         There have thus been transferred to this Board the duties of the Water Commissioners, the Sewerage Commissioners, the Street Commissioners, the City Superintendent, and of the Special Commissioners for the making of assessments.

*************
p.74
CEMETERY FUND
Received for vacationed alley                            $10.00

CEMETERY FUND  
Statement of Expenditures by the Board of Public Works from May 6, 1861 to Dec. 31, 1861 inclusive.

EXPENDITURES
Labor and teaming expended in improving grounds of cemetery
                                                                        $2,445.87
Salary of John C. Ure, Superintendent                    266.65
Trees and evergreens                                           159.00
Fountain                                                                71.03
Lumber                                                                 41.12
Nails and hardware                                                19.23

                                                                       $3,005.90

Although I was unable to locate the original Board of Public Works
ordinance among the Common Council files, on July 1, 1862, the
Chicago Tribune published this summary of items related to the City Cemetery:


The City Cemetery

The Board of Public Works presented an ordinance relative to the city cemetery, providing that hereafter no sales of lots should be made unless by authority of the Council. And that burials shall be confined to lots already sold; that the Board shall expend all monies accruing to the Cemetery fund for the improvement of the grounds; that the Board shall keep a record of all interments, and that the physician in attendance at the demise of the patient, shall give a certificate to the sexton stating disease, etc.; that the Board shall have charge of bodies and preparation of graves, and that $1.50 shall be charged for digging each grave; that any persons burying the dead without permission, discharging fire arms in the cemetery or defacing trees shall be subject to a fine of not less than ten nor exceeding five hundred dollars.

The ordinance was referred to the city attorney and ordered published.
This large image is the second page of undertaker C.H. Jordan's list of the dead whose burials he arranged in January 1863. It is one of twelve lists submitted to the city by separate undertakers during that month. I photographed these records in the Common Council files at the Illinois Regional Archives Depository. All Common Council files in this project are presented courtesy of IRAD.
See the Undertaker and Sexton section for images of the other undertaker lists from January 1963.

Of the thirty individuals whose deaths are listed on this page, five were buried in the City Cemetery,
eleven were buried in the Potter's Field (Public Ground), eight were set into Jordan's vault in the
City Cemetery as an intermediary step to a cemetery burial, four were buried in Rosehill Cemetery,
one in Graceland Cemetery, one in Calvary Cemetery, two were "sent east", and one was sent to Ohio.

The "Residence" column indicates the North, West, or South Division. The Divisions were so-named in relation to the branches of the Chicago River.
 

Courtesy of the Illinois Regional Archives Depository.

In 1861, the city government decided to allow the northern section of the unsurveyed cemetery grounds to begin to be converted to a park. This so-called Cemetery Park is illustrated on the homepage of this Web Site as the overlayed image on the satellite map of today's Lincoln Park. In 1865, Cemetery Park became Chicago's second park named Lake Park. Nine months later, upon the assassination of President Lincoln, the park was named in his honor.
(See the Lincoln Park section for more details.)

_________________________

The article below, is the newspaper's first mention of the newly forming park on the northern unused portion of the City Cemetery.

Chicago Tribune, September 5, 1861

Chicago Tribune, April 2, 1862


Chicago Tribune, May 6, 1863


 

Chicago Tribune, March 27, 1864



Chicago Tribune, June 29, 1864

October 23, 1865

To the Mayor and Aldermen in Common Council.

Several Complaints being made of lot holders of the old Cemetery of Cattle running at large over the Grounds, & therefore recommend the passage of the following resolution.

                           Valentine Ruh
Resolved:
That the board of Public Work be and they are hereby requested to order the building of a fence between the old Cemetery and Park, running East and West

Adopted Oct 16th 1865

Presented to the Mayor for approval Oct. 21st 1865.

A. H. Bodman City Cler.

Approved Oct. 23rd 1865.

J.B. Rice Mayor.
________________________

Commission of Public Works, Annual Report, 1863.
(from Chicago City Manual, 1914.)

Mr. Ure, besides his having the care of the parks scattered over the city, had the superintendence of the cemetery, and was required to make report concerning it once every year to the Board of Public Works. His report for 1863 is still interesting. After telling of what had been done in the actual cemetery, he continues: “We have trimmed the trees in the northern part of the cemetery, generally known as the park; planted a row of maple trees along the first road by the fence on the west side; which are all alive and doing well.” Then again as to the cemetery: “ About six months ago a large portion of the fence of the cemetery was blown down and damaged by a strong wind, and we have repaired it as well as possible under the circumstances. A portion of the fence on the east side of the cemetery was almost covered by drifted sand. The boards of this fence being rotten, we considered it best not to raise it, but put new boards above the old ones where the sand had covered them. There have been buried in the public grounds during the time specified, 2,218 persons, exclusive of the rebel (civil war) prisoners, who were 615 in number; making the total of interments in these grounds 2,833. There was no record of interments in the public grounds until 1861. The number of burials in private lots I cannot report, for the reason that the grave diggers were not under my charge until January 23, 1863. Since that time and up to date, there have been interred in private lots, sixty-two persons. There was expended for the improvement herein named $3,943.11.”

Courtesy of the Illinois Regional Archives Depository.

February 13, 1860

To the Mayor and Aldermen of the City of Chicago in Common Council assembled

         Your Committee on Wharves and Public Grounds to whom was referred the proposed Contract between the City and the Rosehill Cemetery Company, having had the same under advisement by leave to report:

         That upon examination of said Contract we notice the omission of an important and essential article, that is, an article requiring the Rose Hill Cemetery Company to sell single Burial places to the class of our poor that are able and willing to buy single lots, provided the prices of the same are brought within the reach of their means. We have therefore added an article to the Contract binding the Rose Hill Cemetery Co to sell single lots to any one who may want them at the rate of $2.00 each. This additional clause will secure cheap Burial places of their own for our poorer classes and will thereby lessen the number of those, that would otherwise have to be buried in the potter’s field at the expense of the City.

         We recommend the Passage of the following Order

Ordered That the Mayor, Comptroller and City Clerk be and they are hereby directed to enter into Contract with the Rosehill Cemetery Co. substantially in accordance with the agreement herewith submitted.

Respectfully submitted,
C. Wahl                of Com. on Wharves & Public Grounds.

This section of a larger newspaper editorial, which is reproduced in its entirety in the Potter's Field section, references the 1860 agreement with Rosehill Cemetery. The Rosehill Cemetery Company's response is on the right.

Chicago Tribune, February 15, 1863

This newspaper item is a transcription of the minutes from the Common Council meeting where the decision was made to call the northern cemetery grounds, "Lake Park." The park was renamed "Lincoln Park" in 1865 after the assassination of the President, also due to the fact that there was already a Lake Park in Chicago. See the original document, here.

The ordinance referred to in this article is reproduced in the following section of this Web Site: 1865-1869.

Chicago Tribune, October 22, 1864

COMMON COUNCIL.
Special Meeting – A New Park on the North Side.

Pursuant to notice, a special meeting of the City Council was held last evening to take final action on the North Side Park – His Honor the Mayor in the chair.

The following aldermen answered their names: Aldermen Gage, Shimp, Gallup, Kann, Comisky, Clark, Rafferty, Talcott, Holden, Bond, Gastfield, Huntley, Armstrong, Frazer, Ruh, Hottinger, Sullivan, Lawson, O’Sullivan.

The Clerk read the ordinance providing for the Park, and a substitute proposed by B.F. Ayer, Esq., for section III in said ordinance.

Ald. Armstrong moved the adoption of the substitute, and Ald. Shimp wanted to know what the probable cost of the improvement will be, and where the money is to come from, if the proceeds arising from the sale of lots fail to cover

Ald. Holden was in favor of section I and II, but was opposed to section III.

Ald. O’Sullivan could not see the propriety of adopting a part of the ordinance if it were not all adopted.

Ald. Gage wanted to know how many acres had been laid off for a park.

Ald. Armstrong said about sixty acres.

Ald. Kann wanted to know where the poor will be buried if the land be sold.

Ald. O’Sullivan said that the Rosehill Cemetery Company had agreed to bury the poor of the city.

Ald. Talcott was opposed to the sale of the land for cash. It would not bring as much, if sold in that manner, as on canal time.

Ald. Huntley was opposed to the sale of any city property for the benefit of the park. He was in favor of granting the land for the park, and an appropriation could be afterwards made.

Ald. Talcott said it would take more than $20,000 to improve the property. It can’t be done for less than $50,000.

Ald. Titsworth had no objection to setting off a portion of the city property for park purposes. He questioned the propriety of making provisions, in the same ordinance, for its improvement. He was in favor of gradual improvement, as the property in the neighborhood would gradually increase in value. He was opposed to selling the property now, as it would bring more after the park had received a little improvement. He was in favor of parks.

Ald. Shimp was opposed to the sale of the property now. It would not bring more than $15,000. If the park be laid out, in five years it would sell for $100,000.

Ald. Armstrong said the property proposed to be sold was fully half a mile from the park.

Ald. Talcott moved to lay the substitute for the third section on the table. Carried. Ayes, 18: noes, 5.

Ald. Ruh moved to take the ordinance up by sections. Carried.

The first section was then read and adopted.

The second section was taken up.

Ald. Talcott suggested that it be called “Lakeview.”

Ald. Holden moved to call it “Douglas Park.”

Ald. Holden’s motion was lost.

On motion, the Council took up section 2d, and it was unanimously adopted.

The 3d section was next taken up.

Ald. Bond moved to lay on the table.  Carried.
The question of name was taken up.

Ald. Woodman moved to call it “Lake Park”.
Carried.

Ald. Woodman moved that the ordinance was adopted as a whole.

On motion of Ald. Tittsworth, the Council adjourned.

Pamela Bannos © 2017